Holy Father
Pope Francis’ tour of the Americas continues and wherever he goes Catholics flock to get a glimpse of him or perchance a selfie. And for many of them, getting within a few hundred yards of the man is a religious experience because of who they perceive Francis to be…the Vicar of Christ, the successor to Saint Peter, the Holy Father.
But as I argued in my post from my month-long series on the Catholic Church last October, calling the pope “Holy Father” is an affront to the only One who deserves that title. Please read it if you would be inclined to address Pope Francis as such, should he be in your neighborhood.
John 17:11 And I am no longer in the world, but they are in the world, and I am coming to you. Holy Father, keep them in your name, which you have given me, that they may be one, even as we are one.
In Chapter 17 of his gospel, the apostle John records Jesus, after warning, instructing, and comforting his disciples in light of his impending death, turning his eyes to heaven and fervently praying to his Father. What we read there is often referred to as Jesus’ high priestly prayer. It is the night before he goes to the cross, and his concern is for his Father’s glory and for the protection and unity of his disciples, then and now. This is the only place in the Bible where anyone is addressed as “Holy Father,” and it is in the context of a sacred and pivotal moment when God the Son is at the climax of his ministry, about to be sacrificed, made to be sin, and temporarily but painfully separated from God the Father…yet through it gaining the victory over the “prince of this world.” It is as if Jesus has been on a journey his whole earthly life to get to this moment and place where he will be crowned King, and he comes to the One who will crown him and calls him, “Holy Father.”
It is truly dissonant to move directly from thoughts of the great God of the universe as Holy Father, to thoughts of a fallen human being as the same…a mere mortal whose proper title is properly God’s Name. It startles the sensibilities. If there were nothing else improper or dishonoring to God in the Catholic Church’s teaching and practice regarding the pope, that he is called Holy Father is enough reason, for me, to reject his authority.
But there is. The elevation and exaltation of the papacy in assigning the pope universal power and honor, with great pomp and pageantry, divert praise and exaltation away from God, and are completely contrary to Jesus’ example of humility and his instructions to his apostles not to follow the lead of the Pharisees and exalt themselves. As beloved and humble as the current pope may be, he assumes the titles and power given him by the Church, and receives the praise and adulation given by her people.
An audience with the pope involves a whole list of items of protocol, I’m sure. Among them is the expectation that the visitor will bow or kneel before the pope and kiss his ring. Would Peter, whom the Church looks to as the first pope, have allowed anyone to prostrate themselves before him this way? In Acts 10 we have the story of God calling Peter to go share the gospel with a Roman centurion named Cornelius, who was expecting him because of a vision he received in answer to his prayers. When Peter arrives, Cornelius “fell down at his feet and worshiped him.” The Greek word translated “worshiped” is proskuneō and means “to kiss, like a dog licking his master’s hand; to fawn or crouch to, that is, (literally or figuratively) prostrate oneself in homage (do reverence to, adore): – worship.” And how does Peter respond to this treatment? “But Peter lifted him up, saying, ‘Stand up; I too am a man.’” He would not receive such adoration. But every one of his ‘successors’ has and does.
Much has been made of Pope Francis’ more humble choices in living quarters, automobiles, and garments, as compared to his predecessors. That this is admirable only serves to highlight the material excesses that are typical of the papacy. Silk finery, Prada shoes, jeweled headgear, ornate palaces, being carried around on a throne so that his flock can catch a glimpse of him. All more befitting of a king than a shepherd.
The power conferred on every pope more befits a king as well. This man, no matter how godly or corrupt, “by reason of his office as Vicar of Christ, and as pastor of the entire Church has full, supreme, and universal power over the whole Church, a power which he can always exercise unhindered.”1 This power extends even to the submission of mind and will. “In matters of faith and morals, the bishops speak in the name of Christ and the faithful are to accept their teaching and adhere to it with a religious assent. This religious submission of mind and will must be shown in a special way to the authentic magisterium of the Roman Pontiff, even when he is not speaking ex cathedra.”2
The scope of the Supreme Pontiff’s reign was dogmatically defined at the First Vatican Council in 1870, and those who would deny the council’s definition were pronounced cursed: “If anyone thus speaks, that the Roman Pontiff has only the office of inspection or direction, but not the full and supreme power of jurisdiction over the universal Church, not only in things which pertain to faith and morals, but also in those which pertain to the discipline and government of the Church spread over the whole world; or, that he possesses only the more important parts, but not the whole plenitude of this supreme power; or that this power of his is not ordinary and immediate, or over the churches altogether and individually, and over the pastors and the faithful altogether and individually: let him be anathema.”3
One simply cannot extrapolate such excessive and far-reaching power and authority, nor justify the material trappings of a worldly king, from the witness of the New Testament documents. Only time and “the desires of the flesh and the desires of the eyes and pride of life”4 can account for it.
Surely, this is not what Jesus had in mind when he told Peter, “Feed my sheep.”5
1 Catechism of the Catholic Church, 882 2 Lumen Gentium, 25 3 http://www.catholicplanet.org/councils/20-Pastor-Aeternus.htm 4 1 John 2:16 5 John 21:17
We were made to worship. It may come out as toward God, toward an athlete or the Sun, but we ALL worship. The Church of Jesus Christ should stand out as the happiest group on earth, because she knows truth. Christians don’t need to convince their hearts of what their head deems true. It’s the opposite. Sometimes one must battle the brain with what a heart KNOWS.
LikeLike
Well said, Peggy.
LikeLike
Interesting that you quote John 17.
This must be another sign that you are
returning to the One, Holy and Apostolic
Church, The Roman Catholic faith.
Christ did not want all of these man made
groups. He wanted us to be “One”, and
lead by the successor of St. Peter.
LikeLike
The false teachings of the Catholic Church are one of the reasons the Body of Christ is so divided. If the Holy Spirit truly subsisted in her like she professes, her people would come to know and experience the love of God that paid for their sins in total so that they need only believe and trust and they too would have his Spirit and be sealed for eternity in Heaven. But as it is, many, many are turned off to God by inconsistencies, abuses, and irrational doctrines and leave. Many of those, like me, discover the truth though his word and become true followers of Christ. Many others abandon the faith completely.
LikeLike
The problem with your statement is that
their are no false teachings in the Catholic
Church. I pointed out all of the errors in
your claims and you were not able to
refute them. Jesus wants us to be “One”,
Since you are not in communion with Christ’s
Church, then you are not listening to
Jesus.
LikeLike
Dave, that’s simply not true. I would be happy to have a reasoned debate with you about Catholic doctrine and practice, but you’re all boasting and bluster with virtually no substance.Is there something in this post that you believe to be false?
LikeLike
So you are saying Jesus didn’t really want
us to be “One”. Here is an exact quote
directly from the Bible and you do not
want to believe it.
LikeLike
When did I say that I don’t or don’t want to believe that?
LikeLike
Your actions show you don’t believe it.
Good old book of James coming back
at you. If you believed the verse, then
you would not want to be seperated
from the Church founded by Jesus
Christ.
LikeLike
But I am not separated from his church. I am part of his body, as are all who believe and trust in him. As one of the apologists I listen to says, Jesus did not establish an organization but an organism.
In John 17 Jesus also asks his Father to “Sanctify them in the truth,” speaking of his disciples. Do you believe he desires unity irrespective of whether it’s in the truth?
LikeLike
Now you are hitting the nail on the head.
You have your interpretation of what the
“Truth” is. The person next to you at your
Congregation has his interpretation of
Truth. The guy in front speaking has his
interpretation of the Truth. The guy
Playing the guitar walking up and down
The aisle has his.
The difference in the Holy Catholic Church
is that, we are in Communion in our belief.
The little first communion child all the way
to the Pope are “One”, just as Jesus asked.
LikeLike
You may be “in communion” in your belief, but agreement does not make anything true.
LikeLike
You last comment was pretty much sums it up Caroline! Love it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
So what is truth? If everyone in your congregation
has their own definition of the truth, which
one is right. Can you answer that Caroline
or Meredith. The Catholic beliefs came from
the Apostles, they got it from Jesus.
You come along 2,000 years later and decide
you have the answers.
I think I’ll stick with the Apostles and Jesus.
LikeLike
“What is truth?” I can answer that, Dave. But are you going to really hear what I say, or are you going to be like Pilate when he asked it and not even consider an answer? Truth is what corresponds to reality. But I believe what you are really asking is, how does anyone know what that reality is. As I said before, even if all Catholics are “One” in their beliefs (which isn’t the case), that doesn’t make what they believe true. And even if a group of men in their positions as leaders of a massive religious institution claim to have the truth, that doesn’t make it so. Islam claims that the Bible became corrupted and they are the ones with the truth. Do you believe that?
We have good reasons to believe that the New Testament documents are accurate records of the life, death, resurrection, and teaching of Jesus, the formation of the church, and the teaching of his apostles. We do not have the same for non-canonical works nor “Sacred Tradition.” So we can be confident that the Bible is true, and God gives believers his Spirit to help us discern what he is teaching us in it. As John says in 1 John 2, “But you have been anointed by the Holy One, and you all have knowledge. I write to you, not because you do not know the truth, but because you know it, and because no lie is of the truth…But the anointing that you received from him abides in you, and you have no need that anyone should teach you. But as his anointing teaches you about everything, and is true, and is no lie—just as it has taught you, abide in him.”
The apostles taught with the obvious expectation that their hearers and readers should be able to understand what they were teaching. Paul repeatedly says to his readers, “Do you not know…?” or “You know…” If they were establishing a central organizational body with teaching authority we would expect to read something about that in the text, with exhortations to leave the interpretation and meaning to the religious leaders, like my dad used to say to me, instead of what we do find – clear expectation that the average believer can know what the truth is.
Your reticence or refusal to answer specific questions about what is true or false, like on my previous post on faith and works and our Facebook exchange about this post, indicates to me that you are not confident in your own ability to discern truth and are depending instead on the Catholic church to tell you what it is.
But they could be wrong. Are you willing to consider that possibility at all?
LikeLike