Rogue mothers have no decency
The third infant in three months was thrown to her death from a New York City apartment building yesterday. Well, why not? Six months old, 1 month old, 1 hour old….plus nine months. What’s a few more minutes or months?
I’ll tell you what’s a few more. Can you imagine the horror of seeing the helpless, innocent little girls and boy broken and bloodied on the sidewalk? So gross and messy. Why didn’t these mothers dispose of their children properly, before anyone had to see them? It’s really quite inconsiderate and irresponsible of them to have disregarded the parameters in place for such a thing, and force innocent adults to have to witness the killing. Deplorable.
Honestly. Don’t these women understand that once their children are individual human beings and no longer part of their body (that’s the miracle of life, don’t you know) that the rest of us can see them, and any harm done to them offends our sensibilities? Those mothers really should be prosecuted for the psychological damage done to all the witnesses on the ground. Oh, and I’m pretty sure the law protects born babies. So…you know…it sucks to be them.
Here’s another thing…throwing a baby from a seventh-story window pretty much guarantees that no body parts will be salvageable for the very worthwhile enterprise of medical research. Think of all the good these mothers could have done if they had only let their friendly, neighborhood abortion clinic do the deed. That way the clinic benefits, science and medical progress benefit, the mothers are freed of the responsibility of another potential child, and no one gets hurt.
But throwing her out a high-rise apartment window? Good grief…she might have landed on someone’s head!
No, it really does make a difference when you kill a child that a whole bunch of people can see. These mothers should have at least had the decency to smother their children in the privacy of their homes.
What a horrible story… But do you think it truly requires your sarcasm?
Did you know The New York Post quoted a neighbor, Lizette Rodriguez, saying “I heard [the baby’s mother] screaming and she was saying, ‘Praise God!’ ‘Hallelujah!’
Should we talk about her religious delusions? Do you think she might have been acting like Dena Schlosser who while listening to church hymns in 2004 cut off the arms of her 11 month year old baby girl because she claimed God had wanted her to do it as “an offering” before the apocalypse? Or what about Deanna Lajune LeNay who in 2003 bludgeoned her two boys to death because “God was testing her faith.” Or what about Julia Lovemore who in June, 2012, killed her 6 week old daughter by shoving pages of the bible down the child’s throat because she wanted her to ‘absorb’ the books message of love.
Or what about the utter immoral negligence of Dale and Shannon Hickman who “faith healed” their newborn to death after refusing to seek medical attention because they believed their god would heal her? Or Bruce and Deborah Leonard who beat their son to death (over hours, mind you) in a church “counselling” session?
Shall we talk about these events along with Tenisha Fearon’s religious motives?
Only if we also talk about the multi-millions killed by the atheist regimes of Mao, Lenin, Stalin, and Pol Pott.
Pol Pott was a Buddhist, and Mao and Stalin were 20th Century political despots, as you well know. Or what, do you think the Christians Hitler and Pinochet and Musolini and Franco killed millions in the name of their God, your God, Yhwh?
But seriously, what was the purpose of this sarcastic article of yours, Caroline?
Are you embarrassed now to learn this woman was a Christian, screaming “Praise God!” as she hurled her baby out the window?
Does this “fact” alter your perception of the event?
“In power, the Khmer Rouge carried out a radical program that included isolating the country from foreign influence, closing schools, hospitals and factories, abolishing banking, finance and currency, outlawing all religions…”
John, you cannot in all integrity deny that regimes ruled by atheistic ideology have intentionally killed millions of innocent people. Hitler, as we’ve discussed before, was not a Christian, despite him claiming at some point to be. Anyone who claims to follow Christ but systematically murders the innocent is a liar.
I am not “embarrassed” by the liars and the crazies who have killed and claimed Christ. Examine his teachings and you will know they were not following him. Christianity, like any faith, should be judged on its teachings and not on the aberrant behavior of some who align themselves with it.
John, you cannot in all integrity deny that regimes ruled by atheistic ideology have intentionally killed millions of innocent people
Atheism is not an ideology. It is one thing, and nothing else: a non-belief in the gods. Politics has an ideology. Marxism is a political-economic idea based on class struggle. The same idea inspired Pol Pot, who was a Theravada Buddhist.
Hitler, as we’ve discussed before, was not a Christian, despite him claiming at some point to be. Anyone who claims to follow Christ but systematically murders the innocent is a liar.
Hitler was most definitely a Christian, as was Mussolini, Pinochet, and Franco. So, answer me: did these 20th Century Christian dictators kill in the name of your God, Yhwh?
Yes, or No, Caroline?
I am not “embarrassed” by the liars and the crazies who have killed and claimed Christ.
And there it is, the excuse. Of course, they were not True Christians™… Just “crazies.” How convenient, Caroline. Actually reminds me of a story from just yesterday. After Bruce and Deborah Leonard (as well as other members of their Christian church) were arrested for the brutal murder of their son (beating him to death in a Christian counseling session) the church’s neighbour, Tara Litz, said:
Just crazies… Not True Christians™, right, Caroline?
Now, you still haven’t answered the question: what was the purpose of this article of yours, Caroline? What point were you trying to make with your sarcasm? Does that point now alter after discovering the woman was a Christian screaming “Praise God!”
John, if you don’t want your atheism defined by those who are not atheists, then don’t present yourself as an authority on Christianity. And if you don’t want to be identified with atheists who mass-murdered, then don’t identify me with so-called Christians who murder.
If you want to discuss the evidences for Christianity as opposed to atheism, with a sincere desire to know, we can do that. If, as it appears, you only want to argue and denigrate, I’m not interested. And if that’s all I continue to get from you, I will block you from further comments. I don’t have the time, nor the inclination, to address all your unwarranted and misleading attacks on my faith.
John, if you don’t want your atheism defined by those who are not atheists, then don’t present yourself as an authority on Christianity.
Again, atheism is one thing: a non-belief in the gods. There is nothing more to it. Trying to conflate atheism to Marxism or Capitalism, or any other political, economic, or social system is nonsense, and you should know better, Caroline.
Now, you’re going to block me because I was talking about your article? You, Caroline, brought up the political angle, not me…. so why are you now angry? Are you mad because this woman you posted about screamed “Praised God!” as she hurled her baby out the window?
Does that embarrass you?
And you still haven’t answered me: what were you attempting to achieve with this article, Caroline?
Pingback: Whoopi Goldberg commandments and abortion | From guestwriters
Pingback: My Choice (by Jezabel Jonson) | From guestwriters